Xorvatera noxçişka qayqam. (Обращение к чеченским беженцам в Хорватии, в связи с необходимостью озвучить имеющиеся проблемы в СМИ) Представитель правозащитной ассоциации Вайфонд в Германии Мохмад Абдурахманов
Xorvatera noxçişka qayqam. (Обращение к чеченским беженцам в Хорватии, в связи с необходимостью озвучить имеющиеся проблемы в СМИ) Представитель правозащитной ассоциации Вайфонд в Германии Мохмад Абдурахманов
BY NOXÇIYÇÖNAN AZ
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. Some people used the platform to organize ahead of the storming of the U.S. Capitol in January 2021, and last month Senator Mark Warner sent a letter to Durov urging him to curb Russian information operations on Telegram.
from jp
