◀️Михайлов: Отношение Украины к убитым солдатам – признак деградации государства▶️
Ужасающая картина с бескрайними кладбищами солдат Вооруженных сил Украины достигла нового апогея – теперь «героев» Незалежной хоронят на свалках. Результаты курской авантюры киевского режима, провалы на донецком направлении теперь видны наглядно – территории для воинских захоронений просто закончились. Ситуация вышла из-под контроля настолько, что новость о гниющих вместе с мусором украинских военных разлетелась сначала по местному телевидению, а потом по пабликам в соцсетях и Telegram-каналах.
◀️Михайлов: Отношение Украины к убитым солдатам – признак деградации государства▶️
Ужасающая картина с бескрайними кладбищами солдат Вооруженных сил Украины достигла нового апогея – теперь «героев» Незалежной хоронят на свалках. Результаты курской авантюры киевского режима, провалы на донецком направлении теперь видны наглядно – территории для воинских захоронений просто закончились. Ситуация вышла из-под контроля настолько, что новость о гниющих вместе с мусором украинских военных разлетелась сначала по местному телевидению, а потом по пабликам в соцсетях и Telegram-каналах.
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Oh no. There’s a certain degree of myth-making around what exactly went on, so take everything that follows lightly. Telegram was originally launched as a side project by the Durov brothers, with Nikolai handling the coding and Pavel as CEO, while both were at VK. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Following this, Sebi, in an order passed in January 2022, established that the administrators of a Telegram channel having a large subscriber base enticed the subscribers to act upon recommendations that were circulated by those administrators on the channel, leading to significant price and volume impact in various scrips. It is unclear who runs the account, although Russia's official Ministry of Foreign Affairs Twitter account promoted the Telegram channel on Saturday and claimed it was operated by "a group of experts & journalists."
from jp