А вы могли бы представить подобную ситуацию в каком-нибудь Баку? Вот чтобы русские бегали по учебному заведению и призывали резать азеров? Увы, такое мы не можем представить даже в Москве.
А вот азеры, оказывается, бегать в Москве все же могут. Да и еще и русню резать призывают, флагами размахивают.
Хочу увидеть применение 282 статьи по всем этим дикарям. Или у нас по ней карают только русских?
А вы могли бы представить подобную ситуацию в каком-нибудь Баку? Вот чтобы русские бегали по учебному заведению и призывали резать азеров? Увы, такое мы не можем представить даже в Москве.
А вот азеры, оказывается, бегать в Москве все же могут. Да и еще и русню резать призывают, флагами размахивают.
Хочу увидеть применение 282 статьи по всем этим дикарям. Или у нас по ней карают только русских?
BY Адвокат прямого действия⚡️| Алексей Калугин
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from us
