تحدث البشير الإبراهيمي عن الأدب والعناية باللغة وكتب القواميس، وكبار الأدباء ،، ثم سرد مجموعة من كتب الأدب العالية ، ثم قال : … حتى تنتهي إلى المحيط الهادي: الأغاني وما أدراك ما الأغاني . ثم عقب بقول: محالٌ أن تكمل ملكة الأدب لمن لم يقرأ هذه الكتب كلها قراءة تأنّ ودرس.
تحدث البشير الإبراهيمي عن الأدب والعناية باللغة وكتب القواميس، وكبار الأدباء ،، ثم سرد مجموعة من كتب الأدب العالية ، ثم قال : … حتى تنتهي إلى المحيط الهادي: الأغاني وما أدراك ما الأغاني . ثم عقب بقول: محالٌ أن تكمل ملكة الأدب لمن لم يقرأ هذه الكتب كلها قراءة تأنّ ودرس.
BY قناة / عبدالله الشهري
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Recently, Durav wrote on his Telegram channel that users' right to privacy, in light of the war in Ukraine, is "sacred, now more than ever." Telegram boasts 500 million users, who share information individually and in groups in relative security. But Telegram's use as a one-way broadcast channel — which followers can join but not reply to — means content from inauthentic accounts can easily reach large, captive and eager audiences. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation."
from kr
