I want to understand something important. You believe that denying Joseph Smith's miracles is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit because they came from God's power. Yet Joseph Smith used the very same seer stone he later used for translation for treasure hunting. He admitted in court to using it to defraud people before claiming it was a divine gift. So, we have three possibilities.
1. All the power was from God even when Joseph confessed using such to defraud people. 2. It was always the power of something else, or 3. The same identical practice somehow changed sources from fraudulent to divine
Which of these makes the most sense to you? And how do you determine when the same practice went from being fraudulent to divine?
I want to understand something important. You believe that denying Joseph Smith's miracles is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit because they came from God's power. Yet Joseph Smith used the very same seer stone he later used for translation for treasure hunting. He admitted in court to using it to defraud people before claiming it was a divine gift. So, we have three possibilities.
1. All the power was from God even when Joseph confessed using such to defraud people. 2. It was always the power of something else, or 3. The same identical practice somehow changed sources from fraudulent to divine
Which of these makes the most sense to you? And how do you determine when the same practice went from being fraudulent to divine?
BY Ketching up with Dr Bob
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. False news often spreads via public groups, or chats, with potentially fatal effects. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from kr
