بوت حماية قنوات التليكرام من التفليش بواسطة الادمن 🌚 البوت يقوم بمراقبة اعضاء قناتك في حال تم ملاحظة نقصان كبير في عدد اعضاء قناتك سيقوم البوت بطرد الادمن من قناتك باقي التفاصيل داخل البوت اتمنى يعجبكم ❤️ www.group-telegram.com/C_iBot
بوت حماية قنوات التليكرام من التفليش بواسطة الادمن 🌚 البوت يقوم بمراقبة اعضاء قناتك في حال تم ملاحظة نقصان كبير في عدد اعضاء قناتك سيقوم البوت بطرد الادمن من قناتك باقي التفاصيل داخل البوت اتمنى يعجبكم ❤️ www.group-telegram.com/C_iBot
On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said in a video message on Tuesday that Ukrainian forces "destroy the invaders wherever we can." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from kr
