Как-то нет оптимизма по поводу успеха трансфера. В 2018 (?) не получилось потому что помешали. А до того, в 2012-м реформам помешала Болотная, «резонансные уголовные дела и искусственная волна протестов». В 2014-м - помешала Олимпиада и майдан на Украине. В 2016-м - армяно-азербайджанский кризис и переворот (неудавшийся) в Турции. В 2018-м, все планово спутала пенсионная реформа… В 2019-м – опять «война силовиков, резонансные уголовные дела и искусственная волна протестов». И так по кругу… Система это выдерживает, или сама организует, потому что такая Система?
Как-то нет оптимизма по поводу успеха трансфера. В 2018 (?) не получилось потому что помешали. А до того, в 2012-м реформам помешала Болотная, «резонансные уголовные дела и искусственная волна протестов». В 2014-м - помешала Олимпиада и майдан на Украине. В 2016-м - армяно-азербайджанский кризис и переворот (неудавшийся) в Турции. В 2018-м, все планово спутала пенсионная реформа… В 2019-м – опять «война силовиков, резонансные уголовные дела и искусственная волна протестов». И так по кругу… Система это выдерживает, или сама организует, потому что такая Система?
In 2014, Pavel Durov fled the country after allies of the Kremlin took control of the social networking site most know just as VK. Russia's intelligence agency had asked Durov to turn over the data of anti-Kremlin protesters. Durov refused to do so. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Telegram does offer end-to-end encrypted communications through Secret Chats, but this is not the default setting. Standard conversations use the MTProto method, enabling server-client encryption but with them stored on the server for ease-of-access. This makes using Telegram across multiple devices simple, but also means that the regular Telegram chats you’re having with folks are not as secure as you may believe.
from kr
