Не ринулись жители Покачей поддерживать отставку мэра Нефтеюганска. Холодными остались к бедам соседей когалымчане.
"Нет в Югре единства!", - в сердцах бросил идеолог и вновь прибегнул к накруткам. Как и в других случаях, весьма профессионально. Смотрим скорость, с которой "Евгений Зайцев" и прочий "Модест Абрамов" подписывают петицию и радуемся.
Не ринулись жители Покачей поддерживать отставку мэра Нефтеюганска. Холодными остались к бедам соседей когалымчане.
"Нет в Югре единства!", - в сердцах бросил идеолог и вновь прибегнул к накруткам. Как и в других случаях, весьма профессионально. Смотрим скорость, с которой "Евгений Зайцев" и прочий "Модест Абрамов" подписывают петицию и радуемся.
BY Бабушка Югра
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Pavel Durov, Telegram's CEO, is known as "the Russian Mark Zuckerberg," for co-founding VKontakte, which is Russian for "in touch," a Facebook imitator that became the country's most popular social networking site. The message was not authentic, with the real Zelenskiy soon denying the claim on his official Telegram channel, but the incident highlighted a major problem: disinformation quickly spreads unchecked on the encrypted app. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee.
from kr
