На📼 сцене📀 резиденты🐬🦖🦕🐘🐙 и друзья🦂🦙🐈🦜🦚 двух🤝 команд🧦, а также➕ их коллеги👔 из DFF🍤 — Артик🧊 и Спайда🕷, которые🪭 давненько📜⚓️👨🦳 не заглядывали🍷 к нам💞 в гости🥂
Кто🤸♀️ еще🍿 не☃️ был✨ на🍄 новой базе🕸️, готовьтесь🏋🏼♀️ смотреть🌚 на🐩 барокко⚜️, мрамор🗿, деревянные🪵 панели🏠 и люстру🕯️ из книги📒 рекордов🐘
🥸ARTIK + 😎SPAIDA 🤩GUCCI KALE 🥩KOVYAZIN D 😃MASHKOV 🧸SEVADA ✨SPUTNIK 📡TIMOFEY
На📼 сцене📀 резиденты🐬🦖🦕🐘🐙 и друзья🦂🦙🐈🦜🦚 двух🤝 команд🧦, а также➕ их коллеги👔 из DFF🍤 — Артик🧊 и Спайда🕷, которые🪭 давненько📜⚓️👨🦳 не заглядывали🍷 к нам💞 в гости🥂
Кто🤸♀️ еще🍿 не☃️ был✨ на🍄 новой базе🕸️, готовьтесь🏋🏼♀️ смотреть🌚 на🐩 барокко⚜️, мрамор🗿, деревянные🪵 панели🏠 и люстру🕯️ из книги📒 рекордов🐘
🥸ARTIK + 😎SPAIDA 🤩GUCCI KALE 🥩KOVYAZIN D 😃MASHKOV 🧸SEVADA ✨SPUTNIK 📡TIMOFEY
Such instructions could actually endanger people — citizens receive air strike warnings via smartphone alerts. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from kr
