Ну что, новогоднее настроение на максимум 🎅Как же я обожаю это время года 🎄
Вчера отгремел наш первый утренник ❤️ это все так трогательно… Сегодня были на елке, завтра снова. Развлекаем дочь по-полной, и скоро будем развлекаться сами ☃️
Сегодня хочу просто поделиться нашей новогодней атмосферой 🏠 Буду рада в комментариях посмотреть фото ваших красавиц 🌲
Ну что, новогоднее настроение на максимум 🎅Как же я обожаю это время года 🎄
Вчера отгремел наш первый утренник ❤️ это все так трогательно… Сегодня были на елке, завтра снова. Развлекаем дочь по-полной, и скоро будем развлекаться сами ☃️
Сегодня хочу просто поделиться нашей новогодней атмосферой 🏠 Буду рада в комментариях посмотреть фото ваших красавиц 🌲
As such, the SC would like to remind investors to always exercise caution when evaluating investment opportunities, especially those promising unrealistically high returns with little or no risk. Investors should also never deposit money into someone’s personal bank account if instructed. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. For Oleksandra Tsekhanovska, head of the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the Kyiv-based Ukraine Crisis Media Center, the effects are both near- and far-reaching.
from kr
