согласно топ-500 миллиардеров Bloomberg, половина богатейших россиян за 2024 год увеличили состояния на $18 млрд. Среди них есть те, кто коллекционирует и поддерживает искусство и, видимо, продолжит это делать. Данные указаны в миллиардах:
▪️№55 Владимир Потанин $31.5 ▪️№62 Владимир Лисин $28.9 ▪️№70 Вагит Алекперов $27.4 ▪️№78 Леонид Михельсон $24.8 ▪️№143 Михаил Фридман $15.0 ▪️№149 Алишер Усманов $14.8 ▪️№184 Дмитрий Рыболовлев $12.9 ▪️№230 Геннадий Тимченко $11.1 ▪️№339 Сулейман Керимов $8.22 ▪️№380 Виктор Вексельберг $7.66 ▪️№384 Роман Абрамович $7.49 ▪️№398 Петр Авен $7.29 ▪️№418 Алексей Кузьмичев $7.02 ▪️№463 Сергей Галицкий $6.53 ▪️№469 Сергей Попов $6.50
В качестве иллюстрации — банкир Маринуса ван Реймерсвеле из Музея искусств Валансьенна
согласно топ-500 миллиардеров Bloomberg, половина богатейших россиян за 2024 год увеличили состояния на $18 млрд. Среди них есть те, кто коллекционирует и поддерживает искусство и, видимо, продолжит это делать. Данные указаны в миллиардах:
▪️№55 Владимир Потанин $31.5 ▪️№62 Владимир Лисин $28.9 ▪️№70 Вагит Алекперов $27.4 ▪️№78 Леонид Михельсон $24.8 ▪️№143 Михаил Фридман $15.0 ▪️№149 Алишер Усманов $14.8 ▪️№184 Дмитрий Рыболовлев $12.9 ▪️№230 Геннадий Тимченко $11.1 ▪️№339 Сулейман Керимов $8.22 ▪️№380 Виктор Вексельберг $7.66 ▪️№384 Роман Абрамович $7.49 ▪️№398 Петр Авен $7.29 ▪️№418 Алексей Кузьмичев $7.02 ▪️№463 Сергей Галицкий $6.53 ▪️№469 Сергей Попов $6.50
В качестве иллюстрации — банкир Маринуса ван Реймерсвеле из Музея искусств Валансьенна
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. The channel appears to be part of the broader information war that has developed following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The Kremlin has paid Russian TikTok influencers to push propaganda, according to a Vice News investigation, while ProPublica found that fake Russian fact check videos had been viewed over a million times on Telegram. Elsewhere, version 8.6 of Telegram integrates the in-app camera option into the gallery, while a new navigation bar gives quick access to photos, files, location sharing, and more.
from kr
