Dirk Pohlmann, investigativer Journalist mit über 30-jähriger Erfahrung im öffentlich-rechtlichen Fernsehen sowie Markus Fiedler, Filmemacher (u.a. “Die dunkle Seite der Wikipedia“), legen auf der Plattform Wikihausen dar, wie Wikipedia-Artikel massiv manipuliert und vorsätzlich unsachlich gestaltet werden.
🟩🟩🟦🟦🟥🟥🟧🟧
Der Zuschauer erfährt außerdem, wer den Beitrag von dieBasis bei Wikipedia geschrieben hat und mit welchen Methoden Wikipedia arbeitet, um nicht erwünschte Parteien zu beschädigen.
Wo sind hier die Medienanstalten als Aufsichtsbehörde?
Dirk Pohlmann, investigativer Journalist mit über 30-jähriger Erfahrung im öffentlich-rechtlichen Fernsehen sowie Markus Fiedler, Filmemacher (u.a. “Die dunkle Seite der Wikipedia“), legen auf der Plattform Wikihausen dar, wie Wikipedia-Artikel massiv manipuliert und vorsätzlich unsachlich gestaltet werden.
🟩🟩🟦🟦🟥🟥🟧🟧
Der Zuschauer erfährt außerdem, wer den Beitrag von dieBasis bei Wikipedia geschrieben hat und mit welchen Methoden Wikipedia arbeitet, um nicht erwünschte Parteien zu beschädigen.
Wo sind hier die Medienanstalten als Aufsichtsbehörde?
Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee. The regulator said it has been undertaking several campaigns to educate the investors to be vigilant while taking investment decisions based on stock tips. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations.
from kr
