💫💫💫 دوره‌های کنترل کیفیت حین تولید (IPQC) و رگولاتوری در صنعت داروسازی و دوره جامع آزمایشگاه میکروبیولوژی مواد غذایی در روزهای آینده اطلاع رسانی خواهد شد 🙏
💫💫💫 دوره‌های کنترل کیفیت حین تولید (IPQC) و رگولاتوری در صنعت داروسازی و دوره جامع آزمایشگاه میکروبیولوژی مواد غذایی در روزهای آینده اطلاع رسانی خواهد شد 🙏
BY irdci.educationcenter
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The gold standard of encryption, known as end-to-end encryption, where only the sender and person who receives the message are able to see it, is available on Telegram only when the Secret Chat function is enabled. Voice and video calls are also completely encrypted. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Just days after Russia invaded Ukraine, Durov wrote that Telegram was "increasingly becoming a source of unverified information," and he worried about the app being used to "incite ethnic hatred." In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from kr
