⚫️ ابزارهای دفاع از میهن، تا اطّلاع ثانوی، مَردی و نامَردی است.
توجه داشته باشید : مبارزه‌ی امروز ما با #فتنه_۵۷ و فتنه‌گران پنجاه‌وهفتی در راستای تلاش برای #بازتاسیس_دولت_شاهنشاهی_ایران ، بازتابِ عینیت این جمله است که بزرگان فرمودند: از ایران باید دفاع کرد ؛ به نام یا به ننگ .
⚫️ ابزارهای دفاع از میهن، تا اطّلاع ثانوی، مَردی و نامَردی است.
توجه داشته باشید : مبارزه‌ی امروز ما با #فتنه_۵۷ و فتنه‌گران پنجاه‌وهفتی در راستای تلاش برای #بازتاسیس_دولت_شاهنشاهی_ایران ، بازتابِ عینیت این جمله است که بزرگان فرمودند: از ایران باید دفاع کرد ؛ به نام یا به ننگ .
If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee.
from kr
