Переехавший из США американецдаже спустя полтора года жизни в нашей стране продолжает восхищаться тем, насколько духовна Россия. Это он про те самые традиционные ценности, о которых позабыли на Западе.
#Рождество #Иностранцы 🇷🇺Твоя паника — цель врага. С Люди Zспокойнее! |Чат канала
Переехавший из США американецдаже спустя полтора года жизни в нашей стране продолжает восхищаться тем, насколько духовна Россия. Это он про те самые традиционные ценности, о которых позабыли на Западе.
#Рождество #Иностранцы 🇷🇺Твоя паника — цель врага. С Люди Zспокойнее! |Чат канала
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news. Despite Telegram's origins, its approach to users' security has privacy advocates worried. Under the Sebi Act, the regulator has the power to carry out search and seizure of books, registers, documents including electronics and digital devices from any person associated with the securities market.
from kr
