Пассажира рейса из Москвы Льва Шлосберга сегодня по прилёте в Псков задержали, подержали и отпустили. По словам жены политика, изъяли технику.
И ведь теперь (после своего скандального интервью Собчак) иноагент Лев Маркович даже толком и посопротивляться очевидному полицейскому произволу не может. Потому что «тот, кто сопротивляется – не является жертвой. Жертва не сопротивляется»
Пассажира рейса из Москвы Льва Шлосберга сегодня по прилёте в Псков задержали, подержали и отпустили. По словам жены политика, изъяли технику.
И ведь теперь (после своего скандального интервью Собчак) иноагент Лев Маркович даже толком и посопротивляться очевидному полицейскому произволу не может. Потому что «тот, кто сопротивляется – не является жертвой. Жертва не сопротивляется»
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. In 2018, Russia banned Telegram although it reversed the prohibition two years later.
from kr
