Лекарства, которые могут стать угрозой для здоровья.
"Таблетки под язык" для резкого снижения давления - такие лекарства достаточно часто провоцируют инфаркты, инсульты, сердечную недостаточность и острую почечную недостаточность. Опасность заключается как раз в том, что давление резко снижается. "Таблетки под язык", противопоказаны для самостоятельного приема, и во всем мире они уже находятся под запретом.
Проводить над собой эксперименты и использовать такие таблетки самостоятельно - большой риск.
Лекарства, которые могут стать угрозой для здоровья.
"Таблетки под язык" для резкого снижения давления - такие лекарства достаточно часто провоцируют инфаркты, инсульты, сердечную недостаточность и острую почечную недостаточность. Опасность заключается как раз в том, что давление резко снижается. "Таблетки под язык", противопоказаны для самостоятельного приема, и во всем мире они уже находятся под запретом.
Проводить над собой эксперименты и использовать такие таблетки самостоятельно - большой риск.
Again, in contrast to Facebook, Google and Twitter, Telegram's founder Pavel Durov runs his company in relative secrecy from Dubai. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from kr
