На вторую годовщину Указа о частичной мобилизации всем, кто ещё не видел, настоятельно рекомендую поразмыслить над недавней серией тематических постов от товарища Вольта⬇️
На вторую годовщину Указа о частичной мобилизации всем, кто ещё не видел, настоятельно рекомендую поразмыслить над недавней серией тематических постов от товарища Вольта⬇️
BY Филолог в засаде
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today." Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read."
from kr
