Идея реабилитации запрещенных соцсетей продиктована, конечно, не тоской по западному образу жизни. Так-то запрет более чем условный, кому эти соцсети актуальны, продолжают ими пользоваться. Проблема в одном - запрещенные и признанные экстремистскими Instagram и Facebook позволяли неплохо монетизировать контент. Разрешенные ВК и Телеграм монетизации поддаются с большим трудом. Т.о. инициативы по снятию запрета на запрещенные сети - не более чем попытка заинтересованных и финансово пострадавших блогеров, вернуться в понятный и коммерчески успешный бизнес. Политики тут точно ни на грош.
Идея реабилитации запрещенных соцсетей продиктована, конечно, не тоской по западному образу жизни. Так-то запрет более чем условный, кому эти соцсети актуальны, продолжают ими пользоваться. Проблема в одном - запрещенные и признанные экстремистскими Instagram и Facebook позволяли неплохо монетизировать контент. Разрешенные ВК и Телеграм монетизации поддаются с большим трудом. Т.о. инициативы по снятию запрета на запрещенные сети - не более чем попытка заинтересованных и финансово пострадавших блогеров, вернуться в понятный и коммерчески успешный бизнес. Политики тут точно ни на грош.
BY Псковская Лента Новостей
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. The regulator said it has been undertaking several campaigns to educate the investors to be vigilant while taking investment decisions based on stock tips. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from kr
