Як дешево хлопці за морем собі Кров'ю добилися волі і права,— Так ми не дамось ганьбі: Воля чи смерть в боротьбі! Геть королів! Тільки Луддові слава!
Коли натчемо полотна ми сувій, Замість човника візьмемо зброю І кінемось в бій, Тиранів у виріб сповиємо свій, Забарвивши саван рудою.
Хай кров, як і серце, давно в них гнилі, Бо жили ворожі наповнені брудом, Та сили в крові не малі,— Від них забуя на землі Те древо Свободи, посаджене Луддом.
Як дешево хлопці за морем собі Кров'ю добилися волі і права,— Так ми не дамось ганьбі: Воля чи смерть в боротьбі! Геть королів! Тільки Луддові слава!
Коли натчемо полотна ми сувій, Замість човника візьмемо зброю І кінемось в бій, Тиранів у виріб сповиємо свій, Забарвивши саван рудою.
Хай кров, як і серце, давно в них гнилі, Бо жили ворожі наповнені брудом, Та сили в крові не малі,— Від них забуя на землі Те древо Свободи, посаджене Луддом.
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Ukrainian forces successfully attacked Russian vehicles in the capital city of Kyiv thanks to a public tip made through the encrypted messaging app Telegram, Ukraine's top law-enforcement agency said on Tuesday. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from kr
