Депутат Госдумы от Дагестана Гаджиев считает, что за терактом в республике стоят спецслужбы Украины и стран НАТО.
А я считаю, что если мы каждый теракт, замешанный на национальной и религиозной нетерпимости, ненависти и русофобии, будем списывать на происки Украины и НАТО, то этот розовый туман приведёт нас к большим проблемам.
В чужом глазу соринку видим, в своем - бревна не разглядим. А пора бы.
Депутат Госдумы от Дагестана Гаджиев считает, что за терактом в республике стоят спецслужбы Украины и стран НАТО.
А я считаю, что если мы каждый теракт, замешанный на национальной и религиозной нетерпимости, ненависти и русофобии, будем списывать на происки Украины и НАТО, то этот розовый туман приведёт нас к большим проблемам.
В чужом глазу соринку видим, в своем - бревна не разглядим. А пора бы.
BY РОГОЗИН
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Soloviev also promoted the channel in a post he shared on his own Telegram, which has 580,000 followers. The post recommended his viewers subscribe to "War on Fakes" in a time of fake news. "This time we received the coordinates of enemy vehicles marked 'V' in Kyiv region," it added. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from kr
