Глава Оймяконского улуса Иннокентий Сивцев, который уличил Сахадэй в проблемах со слухом, задержан.
Недавно на него "наехали" в ДП, опубликовав критический релиз о срывах сроков подготовки к Ысыаху Олонхо. Сам Сивцев хоть и признавал проблемы, но считал их решаемыми.
Какие претензии возникли к нему у следствия, пока неизвестно. @sakhaday
Глава Оймяконского улуса Иннокентий Сивцев, который уличил Сахадэй в проблемах со слухом, задержан.
Недавно на него "наехали" в ДП, опубликовав критический релиз о срывах сроков подготовки к Ысыаху Олонхо. Сам Сивцев хоть и признавал проблемы, но считал их решаемыми.
Какие претензии возникли к нему у следствия, пока неизвестно. @sakhaday
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries.
from kr
