Внезапно оказалось, что большое количество ЛОМов и ЛОМиков втайне почитывали и посматривали «Басе». Только в обычные дни — это зашквар (без иронии), а сегодня — быть в тренде (с иронией).
И вроде как бы и хуй с ними — пусть возвеличиваются на фоне смерти, раз им убеждения позволяют. Но к чему эта патетика про «клеймо на всех нас», «мы тоже в ответе» и прочее.
Внезапно оказалось, что большое количество ЛОМов и ЛОМиков втайне почитывали и посматривали «Басе». Только в обычные дни — это зашквар (без иронии), а сегодня — быть в тренде (с иронией).
И вроде как бы и хуй с ними — пусть возвеличиваются на фоне смерти, раз им убеждения позволяют. Но к чему эта патетика про «клеймо на всех нас», «мы тоже в ответе» и прочее.
Совсем ебанулись?
BY Степной бестиарий
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers. He adds: "Telegram has become my primary news source." One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from kr
