🌍🇺🇦 В городах мира прошли демонстрации в поддержку Украины
В крупных городах по всему миру тысячи украинцев и их сторонников вышли на улицы, чтобы отметить третью годовщину полномасштабного вторжения России в Украину. Люди несли украинские флаги, плакаты с призывами к миру, а также фотографии разрушенных украинских городов.
🌍🇺🇦 В городах мира прошли демонстрации в поддержку Украины
В крупных городах по всему миру тысячи украинцев и их сторонников вышли на улицы, чтобы отметить третью годовщину полномасштабного вторжения России в Украину. Люди несли украинские флаги, плакаты с призывами к миру, а также фотографии разрушенных украинских городов.
The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Pavel Durov, a billionaire who embraces an all-black wardrobe and is often compared to the character Neo from "the Matrix," funds Telegram through his personal wealth and debt financing. And despite being one of the world's most popular tech companies, Telegram reportedly has only about 30 employees who defer to Durov for most major decisions about the platform. Additionally, investors are often instructed to deposit monies into personal bank accounts of individuals who claim to represent a legitimate entity, and/or into an unrelated corporate account. To lend credence and to lure unsuspecting victims, perpetrators usually claim that their entity and/or the investment schemes are approved by financial authorities. These administrators had built substantial positions in these scrips prior to the circulation of recommendations and offloaded their positions subsequent to rise in price of these scrips, making significant profits at the expense of unsuspecting investors, Sebi noted.
from kr
