У Захара Прилепина развилась настоящая шизофрения. В одной жизни - он никому не нужный политический труп, а в другой - приближённый президенту преуспевающий политик, обменивающийся с ним условными сигналами. https://www.group-telegram.com/nomenclatura/6955
У Захара Прилепина развилась настоящая шизофрения. В одной жизни - он никому не нужный политический труп, а в другой - приближённый президенту преуспевающий политик, обменивающийся с ним условными сигналами. https://www.group-telegram.com/nomenclatura/6955
BY Вечерний пророк
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. The picture was mixed overseas. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1.6%, under pressure from U.S. regulatory scrutiny on New York-listed Chinese companies. Stocks were more buoyant in Europe, where Frankfurt’s DAX surged 1.4%.
from kr
