пишет известный баброполитолог Алексей Аксютенко. И дальше там еще много букв о том, как бы можно было от кибербуллинга избавиться (подсказка: главное не дружить с решительнойЕленой Евгеньевной).
Это, видимо, о следующем посте деловитогоАлексея Викторовича:
пишет известный баброполитолог Алексей Аксютенко. И дальше там еще много букв о том, как бы можно было от кибербуллинга избавиться (подсказка: главное не дружить с решительнойЕленой Евгеньевной).
Это, видимо, о следующем посте деловитогоАлексея Викторовича:
READ MORE "Someone posing as a Ukrainian citizen just joins the chat and starts spreading misinformation, or gathers data, like the location of shelters," Tsekhanovska said, noting how false messages have urged Ukrainians to turn off their phones at a specific time of night, citing cybersafety. In the past, it was noticed that through bulk SMSes, investors were induced to invest in or purchase the stocks of certain listed companies. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from us
