Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 14130 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Война по обе стороны Земли | Telegram Webview: latamguerras/3102 -
🇮🇱🇱🇧 В #ливан взрываются аккумуляторы пейджеров и радиостанций и других устройств. Предположительно, они были взломаны хакерами #израиль, которые перегружают и взрывают их аккумуляторы. Неназванный представитель "Хезболлы" заявил Reuters, что это "крупнейший провал безопасности". Количество раненых неизвестно, предположительно исчисляется сотнями. Плюс авиаудары.
🇮🇱🇱🇧 В #ливан взрываются аккумуляторы пейджеров и радиостанций и других устройств. Предположительно, они были взломаны хакерами #израиль, которые перегружают и взрывают их аккумуляторы. Неназванный представитель "Хезболлы" заявил Reuters, что это "крупнейший провал безопасности". Количество раненых неизвестно, предположительно исчисляется сотнями. Плюс авиаудары.
But because group chats and the channel features are not end-to-end encrypted, Galperin said user privacy is potentially under threat. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us
