⚡️⚡️⚡️Результаты экзитпол по Пермскому краю за три дня голосования нарастающим итогом на 17 марта на 20.00 Даванков - 4,6%, Путин - 86,6%, Слуцкий - 2,7%, Харитонов - 4,9%. Испортил - 1,2%.
⚡️⚡️⚡️Результаты экзитпол по Пермскому краю за три дня голосования нарастающим итогом на 17 марта на 20.00 Даванков - 4,6%, Путин - 86,6%, Слуцкий - 2,7%, Харитонов - 4,9%. Испортил - 1,2%.
BY Лбов
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Update March 8, 2022: EFF has clarified that Channels and Groups are not fully encrypted, end-to-end, updated our post to link to Telegram’s FAQ for Cloud and Secret chats, updated to clarify that auto-delete is available for group and channel admins, and added some additional links. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed. In addition, Telegram now supports the use of third-party streaming tools like OBS Studio and XSplit to broadcast live video, allowing users to add overlays and multi-screen layouts for a more professional look. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from us
