⏺на карманы и пояс джинсов и юбок ⏺для создания драпировки на джемперах, кардиганах, футболках, топах, платьях и юбках ⏺для приталивания рубашки и платья. ⏺вместо пуговиц ⏺на босоножки ⏺на лацканы, рукава, воротники жакетов и рубашек.
⏺на карманы и пояс джинсов и юбок ⏺для создания драпировки на джемперах, кардиганах, футболках, топах, платьях и юбках ⏺для приталивания рубашки и платья. ⏺вместо пуговиц ⏺на босоножки ⏺на лацканы, рукава, воротники жакетов и рубашек.
Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. "There is a significant risk of insider threat or hacking of Telegram systems that could expose all of these chats to the Russian government," said Eva Galperin with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which has called for Telegram to improve its privacy practices. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." "There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from us
