Дом-памятник Ивану Гончарову в Ульяновске (Краеведческий музей) и Президентский мост попали в список для голосования на размещение на новой купюре в 1000 рублей
Но, скорее всего, такой результат, как у "Метеора", не превзойти...
Дом-памятник Ивану Гончарову в Ульяновске (Краеведческий музей) и Президентский мост попали в список для голосования на размещение на новой купюре в 1000 рублей
Но, скорее всего, такой результат, как у "Метеора", не превзойти...
In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. One thing that Telegram now offers to all users is the ability to “disappear” messages or set remote deletion deadlines. That enables users to have much more control over how long people can access what you’re sending them. Given that Russian law enforcement officials are reportedly (via Insider) stopping people in the street and demanding to read their text messages, this could be vital to protect individuals from reprisals. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts. Emerson Brooking, a disinformation expert at the Atlantic Council's Digital Forensic Research Lab, said: "Back in the Wild West period of content moderation, like 2014 or 2015, maybe they could have gotten away with it, but it stands in marked contrast with how other companies run themselves today."
from us