Оставим в стороне «дискуссию» о том, для чего на самом деле собирает деньги Олег Скрипка. Но ведь именно этот «идейный украинский» деятель культуры записал, так называемый, гимн новой украинской армии, взяв за основу гимн УПА, о чём синим по желтому написано в украинской Википедии.
Интересно, как Миша (Натанович) Козырев, относится к подобному «творчеству» Скрипки? Как еврей может запросто рекламировать нациста? Мало того, прямо помогать собирать ему деньги!
В голову не укладывается, что у них в головах.
Впрочем, после откровений посла Израиля на Украине, мол, Бандера и Шухевич не такие уж и нацисты, Козырев, ну наверное, «полезный дурачок» просто. Пока полезный, конечно. И то не факт.
Оставим в стороне «дискуссию» о том, для чего на самом деле собирает деньги Олег Скрипка. Но ведь именно этот «идейный украинский» деятель культуры записал, так называемый, гимн новой украинской армии, взяв за основу гимн УПА, о чём синим по желтому написано в украинской Википедии.
Интересно, как Миша (Натанович) Козырев, относится к подобному «творчеству» Скрипки? Как еврей может запросто рекламировать нациста? Мало того, прямо помогать собирать ему деньги!
В голову не укладывается, что у них в головах.
Впрочем, после откровений посла Израиля на Украине, мол, Бандера и Шухевич не такие уж и нацисты, Козырев, ну наверное, «полезный дурачок» просто. Пока полезный, конечно. И то не факт.
The news also helped traders look past another report showing decades-high inflation and shake off some of the volatility from recent sessions. The Bureau of Labor Statistics' February Consumer Price Index (CPI) this week showed another surge in prices even before Russia escalated its attacks in Ukraine. The headline CPI — soaring 7.9% over last year — underscored the sticky inflationary pressures reverberating across the U.S. economy, with everything from groceries to rents and airline fares getting more expensive for everyday consumers. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from us
