Про «кланы» (как политические кланы) и допустимость использования этого термина применительно к постсоветской политической жизни. Пытаюсь объяснить, почему опасно говорить про «противостояние кланов». Кроме того, я пытаюсь на пальцах объяснить, как возникает политический клан и как туда попадают. #минилекции
Про «кланы» (как политические кланы) и допустимость использования этого термина применительно к постсоветской политической жизни. Пытаюсь объяснить, почему опасно говорить про «противостояние кланов». Кроме того, я пытаюсь на пальцах объяснить, как возникает политический клан и как туда попадают. #минилекции
BY Мендкович
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
The SC urges the public to refer to the SC’s I nvestor Alert List before investing. The list contains details of unauthorised websites, investment products, companies and individuals. Members of the public who suspect that they have been approached by unauthorised firms or individuals offering schemes that promise unrealistic returns "There are several million Russians who can lift their head up from propaganda and try to look for other sources, and I'd say that most look for it on Telegram," he said. Messages are not fully encrypted by default. That means the company could, in theory, access the content of the messages, or be forced to hand over the data at the request of a government. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores.
from us
