Украина так и не провела ни один аукцион долгосрочного бронирования своей газотранспортной системы на границе с Россией, подтверждают данные торговой платформы RBP.
.Ранее также не состоялись аукционы на первый квартал и весь 2025 год. Действующий транзитный договор на прокачку газа из России в Европу завершается 31 декабря. Киев официально исключает возможность его продления.
Украина так и не провела ни один аукцион долгосрочного бронирования своей газотранспортной системы на границе с Россией, подтверждают данные торговой платформы RBP.
.Ранее также не состоялись аукционы на первый квартал и весь 2025 год. Действующий транзитный договор на прокачку газа из России в Европу завершается 31 декабря. Киев официально исключает возможность его продления.
BY Ateo Breaking
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
At this point, however, Durov had already been working on Telegram with his brother, and further planned a mobile-first social network with an explicit focus on anti-censorship. Later in April, he told TechCrunch that he had left Russia and had “no plans to go back,” saying that the nation was currently “incompatible with internet business at the moment.” He added later that he was looking for a country that matched his libertarian ideals to base his next startup. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. The Russian invasion of Ukraine has been a driving force in markets for the past few weeks. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care.
from ms
