Читайте, сохраняйте, ставьте реакции и следите за новыми постами и обзорами🩶 Каждый найдет интересное для себя в ежедневныхподборках.
📎Кликай по названию, чтобы перейти на маркетплейс с товаром. *Не реклама #одежда #обувь #декор #аксессуары #wb #ozon #lamoda #oozor #Aliexpress #NewYear #NY
Читайте, сохраняйте, ставьте реакции и следите за новыми постами и обзорами🩶 Каждый найдет интересное для себя в ежедневныхподборках.
📎Кликай по названию, чтобы перейти на маркетплейс с товаром. *Не реклама #одежда #обувь #декор #аксессуары #wb #ozon #lamoda #oozor #Aliexpress #NewYear #NY
The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. Although some channels have been removed, the curation process is considered opaque and insufficient by analysts.
from ms
