Этот комментарий уже вызывал много гнева и заметьте, что это не было сочувствием к Хезболле в целом или Насралле в частности. За этими людьми много крови израильтян и ещё больше сирийцев.
Единственная выраженная здесь мысль состояла в том, что эффективность этой ликвидации ограничена, так как причины существования Хезболлы не сводятся к растапливающей сердца харизме шиитского бандита. Я понимаю, что в эти безрадостные дни как никогда нужны причины для празднования, но повод, возможно, не так велик как кажется
Этот комментарий уже вызывал много гнева и заметьте, что это не было сочувствием к Хезболле в целом или Насралле в частности. За этими людьми много крови израильтян и ещё больше сирийцев.
Единственная выраженная здесь мысль состояла в том, что эффективность этой ликвидации ограничена, так как причины существования Хезболлы не сводятся к растапливающей сердца харизме шиитского бандита. Я понимаю, что в эти безрадостные дни как никогда нужны причины для празднования, но повод, возможно, не так велик как кажется
BY Женёк из Иерусалима
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
"There are a lot of things that Telegram could have been doing this whole time. And they know exactly what they are and they've chosen not to do them. That's why I don't trust them," she said. The War on Fakes channel has repeatedly attempted to push conspiracies that footage from Ukraine is somehow being falsified. One post on the channel from February 24 claimed without evidence that a widely viewed photo of a Ukrainian woman injured in an airstrike in the city of Chuhuiv was doctored and that the woman was seen in a different photo days later without injuries. The post, which has over 600,000 views, also baselessly claimed that the woman's blood was actually makeup or grape juice. Oleksandra Matviichuk, a Kyiv-based lawyer and head of the Center for Civil Liberties, called Durov’s position "very weak," and urged concrete improvements. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform.
from ms
