Notice: file_put_contents(): Write of 7520 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 50 Иркутск политический | Telegram Webview: Irkpolicy/34946 -
Константин Зайцев никуда не уходит с должности председателя правительства Иркутской области. О предложении возглавить какой-либо регион страны ничего не известно.
Попытка этого вброса похожа на недавний фейк о возбуждении уголовного дела в отношении первого заместителя губернатора Романа Колесова.
Отмечаем попытки дестабилизации управления регионом. Интересантов этого сейчас немало и они не сильно скрываются.
Константин Зайцев никуда не уходит с должности председателя правительства Иркутской области. О предложении возглавить какой-либо регион страны ничего не известно.
Попытка этого вброса похожа на недавний фейк о возбуждении уголовного дела в отношении первого заместителя губернатора Романа Колесова.
Отмечаем попытки дестабилизации управления регионом. Интересантов этого сейчас немало и они не сильно скрываются.
BY Иркутск политический
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. So, uh, whenever I hear about Telegram, it’s always in relation to something bad. What gives? Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. For example, WhatsApp restricted the number of times a user could forward something, and developed automated systems that detect and flag objectionable content.
from ms
