(18 +) НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) (ПРОИЗВЕДЕН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН) ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ С.М. ЛАДОЙ-РУСЬ (ПЕУНОВОЙ) ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА С.М. ЛАДЫ-РУСЬ (ПЕУНОВОЙ)
Миром очень хотят владеть 300 семей, черная аристократия, как говорил Джон Колеман. Но ведь народ может и не согласиться с рабством.
(18 +) НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) (ПРОИЗВЕДЕН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН И (ИЛИ) НАПРАВЛЕН) ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ С.М. ЛАДОЙ-РУСЬ (ПЕУНОВОЙ) ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА С.М. ЛАДЫ-РУСЬ (ПЕУНОВОЙ)
Миром очень хотят владеть 300 семей, черная аристократия, как говорил Джон Колеман. Но ведь народ может и не согласиться с рабством.
But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. At the start of 2018, the company attempted to launch an Initial Coin Offering (ICO) which would enable it to enable payments (and earn the cash that comes from doing so). The initial signals were promising, especially given Telegram’s user base is already fairly crypto-savvy. It raised an initial tranche of cash – worth more than a billion dollars – to help develop the coin before opening sales to the public. Unfortunately, third-party sales of coins bought in those initial fundraising rounds raised the ire of the SEC, which brought the hammer down on the whole operation. In 2020, officials ordered Telegram to pay a fine of $18.5 million and hand back much of the cash that it had raised. READ MORE Unlike Silicon Valley giants such as Facebook and Twitter, which run very public anti-disinformation programs, Brooking said: "Telegram is famously lax or absent in its content moderation policy." Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from ms
