В сквере Enghave Park 🌳 расположена классная детская площадка 👶🧒👦
Во-перых, она большая и тут много всего, есть даже тарзанка 💪🏻
Во-вторых, тут есть домик с настолками, настольным теннисом 🏓 и футболом ⚽️игрушками, великами и т.п. Их можно брать в часы работы 🕰️ Потом домик запирают 🔐 Это финансируется муниципалитетом 🧐
Так что это не только детская площадка 🛝 Для подростков это место, где можно потусить без родителей и бесплатно 🆓, особенно если погода не очень ⛈️
Неплохая альтернатива беспризорным посиделкам и компьютерным играм 🎮😉
В сквере Enghave Park 🌳 расположена классная детская площадка 👶🧒👦
Во-перых, она большая и тут много всего, есть даже тарзанка 💪🏻
Во-вторых, тут есть домик с настолками, настольным теннисом 🏓 и футболом ⚽️игрушками, великами и т.п. Их можно брать в часы работы 🕰️ Потом домик запирают 🔐 Это финансируется муниципалитетом 🧐
Так что это не только детская площадка 🛝 Для подростков это место, где можно потусить без родителей и бесплатно 🆓, особенно если погода не очень ⛈️
Неплохая альтернатива беспризорным посиделкам и компьютерным играм 🎮😉
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. The last couple days have exemplified that uncertainty. On Thursday, news emerged that talks in Turkey between the Russia and Ukraine yielded no positive result. But on Friday, Reuters reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin said there had been some “positive shifts” in talks between the two sides. But Kliuchnikov, the Ukranian now in France, said he will use Signal or WhatsApp for sensitive conversations, but questions around privacy on Telegram do not give him pause when it comes to sharing information about the war. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations.
from ms
