Ну, интересно, что власти будут делать с этим. Раньше, когда по какой-то причине разгонять митинг не решались, и митингующие оставались ночевать — их просто заталкивали в метро перед его закрытием.
18+ НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ ПРОИЗВЕДЕН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ ШТЕФАНОВЫМ АЛЕКСАНДРОМ АНДРЕЕВИЧЕМ
Тут станция ближайшая далековато + картинка дикая получится. Мб затолкают в автобус какой и вывезут просто в другой район Москвы.
Ну, интересно, что власти будут делать с этим. Раньше, когда по какой-то причине разгонять митинг не решались, и митингующие оставались ночевать — их просто заталкивали в метро перед его закрытием.
18+ НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ ПРОИЗВЕДЕН, РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ ШТЕФАНОВЫМ АЛЕКСАНДРОМ АНДРЕЕВИЧЕМ
Тут станция ближайшая далековато + картинка дикая получится. Мб затолкают в автобус какой и вывезут просто в другой район Москвы.
On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report. If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats. Russians and Ukrainians are both prolific users of Telegram. They rely on the app for channels that act as newsfeeds, group chats (both public and private), and one-to-one communication. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine, Telegram has remained an important lifeline for both Russians and Ukrainians, as a way of staying aware of the latest news and keeping in touch with loved ones.
from ms
