Telegram Group Β»
Montserrat Β»
ππ«π±π¦ βπ’ππ―π’π΄ βπ¬π¬π±π° Β»
Telegram Webview Β»
Post 401
Forwarded from π¬πππ πΈπππππ ππππππππ (Anti Modern Versions)
Frederick Scrivener worked on the Revised Version 1881/RV. Philip Schaff & James Strong worked on the American Standard Version/ASV 1901 (The revised New Testament and History of revision: Giving a literal reprint of the Authorized English edition of the Revised New Testament, Pages 95, 106, 110), which led to all today's modern versions
Title Page Link)
Chapter IX Link
On James Strong - Page 110 Link, ON Philip Schaff - Page 106 Link & 107 Link [same Page 107 Link involves Scrivener as well].
Main Point - Here's a great reason to avoid James Strong's Concordance: Strong worked on the corrupt ASV/American Standard Version Old Testament Committee, which was corrupt & influenced by the 1881 Revised Version [which occultists Westcott & Hort worked on]+its underlying source text from Vaticanus+Sinaiticus! James Strong's ASV goes against the KJB & twists verses
Discard James Strong's ASV Strong's Concordance & RV 1881
Get, read, & believe the words of the KJB
Follow π¬πππ πΈπππππ ππππππππ @AntiModernVersions
Title Page Link)
Chapter IX Link
On James Strong - Page 110 Link, ON Philip Schaff - Page 106 Link & 107 Link [same Page 107 Link involves Scrivener as well].
Main Point - Here's a great reason to avoid James Strong's Concordance: Strong worked on the corrupt ASV/American Standard Version Old Testament Committee, which was corrupt & influenced by the 1881 Revised Version [which occultists Westcott & Hort worked on]+its underlying source text from Vaticanus+Sinaiticus! James Strong's ASV goes against the KJB & twists verses
Discard James Strong's ASV Strong's Concordance & RV 1881
Get, read, & believe the words of the KJB
Follow π¬πππ πΈπππππ ππππππππ @AntiModernVersions
group-telegram.com/antihebrewroots/401
Create:
Last Update:
Last Update:
Frederick Scrivener worked on the Revised Version 1881/RV. Philip Schaff & James Strong worked on the American Standard Version/ASV 1901 (The revised New Testament and History of revision: Giving a literal reprint of the Authorized English edition of the Revised New Testament, Pages 95, 106, 110), which led to all today's modern versions
Title Page Link)
Chapter IX Link
On James Strong - Page 110 Link, ON Philip Schaff - Page 106 Link & 107 Link [same Page 107 Link involves Scrivener as well].
Main Point - Here's a great reason to avoid James Strong's Concordance: Strong worked on the corrupt ASV/American Standard Version Old Testament Committee, which was corrupt & influenced by the 1881 Revised Version [which occultists Westcott & Hort worked on]+its underlying source text from Vaticanus+Sinaiticus! James Strong's ASV goes against the KJB & twists verses
Discard James Strong's ASV Strong's Concordance & RV 1881
Get, read, & believe the words of the KJB
Follow π¬πππ πΈπππππ ππππππππ @AntiModernVersions
Title Page Link)
Chapter IX Link
On James Strong - Page 110 Link, ON Philip Schaff - Page 106 Link & 107 Link [same Page 107 Link involves Scrivener as well].
Main Point - Here's a great reason to avoid James Strong's Concordance: Strong worked on the corrupt ASV/American Standard Version Old Testament Committee, which was corrupt & influenced by the 1881 Revised Version [which occultists Westcott & Hort worked on]+its underlying source text from Vaticanus+Sinaiticus! James Strong's ASV goes against the KJB & twists verses
Discard James Strong's ASV Strong's Concordance & RV 1881
Get, read, & believe the words of the KJB
Follow π¬πππ πΈπππππ ππππππππ @AntiModernVersions
BY ππ«π±π¦ βπ’ππ―π’π΄ βπ¬π¬π±π°
Share with your friend now:
group-telegram.com/antihebrewroots/401