Перед задержанием ворошиловский стрелок из ХМАО открыл огонь по полицейским. Теперь ему грозит до 15 лет лишения свободы.
После стрельбы по дому 15-летнего ухажёра своей дочурки (его там, кстати, в итоге не оказалось) Грубцов пошёл романтично бродить по "своему" посёлку с нарезным карабином "Тигр" калибра 7,62. Его заметил участковый и попытался угомонить, в ответ чиновник открыл огонь. Потом убежал в дом знакомого, зарядился и снова устроил войнушку — стрелял по прибывшим силовикам. В итоге Грубцова задержали живым и пьяным. Впереди у него суд по трём статьям.
Перед задержанием ворошиловский стрелок из ХМАО открыл огонь по полицейским. Теперь ему грозит до 15 лет лишения свободы.
После стрельбы по дому 15-летнего ухажёра своей дочурки (его там, кстати, в итоге не оказалось) Грубцов пошёл романтично бродить по "своему" посёлку с нарезным карабином "Тигр" калибра 7,62. Его заметил участковый и попытался угомонить, в ответ чиновник открыл огонь. Потом убежал в дом знакомого, зарядился и снова устроил войнушку — стрелял по прибывшим силовикам. В итоге Грубцова задержали живым и пьяным. Впереди у него суд по трём статьям.
Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. "The result is on this photo: fiery 'greetings' to the invaders," the Security Service of Ukraine wrote alongside a photo showing several military vehicles among plumes of black smoke. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from ms
