Взвод має прикривати небо для роботи бригади, що є критично важливим.
❗️Наша мета – 20000.
Загальна мета – 444000 (авто, старлінк, РЕБ та тепловізор).
💥 Для тих хто захоче зробити донат від 200 грн, rukh.live розіграє платівку культового альбому Світлани Няньо Transilvania Smile 1994 (пишіть свій інстаграм в описі донату, якщо бажаєте взяти участь)
Взвод має прикривати небо для роботи бригади, що є критично важливим.
❗️Наша мета – 20000.
Загальна мета – 444000 (авто, старлінк, РЕБ та тепловізор).
💥 Для тих хто захоче зробити донат від 200 грн, rukh.live розіграє платівку культового альбому Світлани Няньо Transilvania Smile 1994 (пишіть свій інстаграм в описі донату, якщо бажаєте взяти участь)
"Your messages about the movement of the enemy through the official chatbot … bring new trophies every day," the government agency tweeted. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. Some privacy experts say Telegram is not secure enough
from ms
