«Справедливая Россия» пожаловалась в избирком Челябинской области на списки домов, которые включены в схему одномандатных округов.
Среди них оказались полностью расселенные и даже снесенные дома, однако их «жильцы» числятся в списках избирателей на выборах в гордуму Челябинска. ________________ ✔️Будьте в курсе выборов в России: Выборы, всем ЦЫК! ✔️Подпишитесь на www.group-telegram.com/ms/cikrf.com
«Справедливая Россия» пожаловалась в избирком Челябинской области на списки домов, которые включены в схему одномандатных округов.
Среди них оказались полностью расселенные и даже снесенные дома, однако их «жильцы» числятся в списках избирателей на выборах в гордуму Челябинска. ________________ ✔️Будьте в курсе выборов в России: Выборы, всем ЦЫК! ✔️Подпишитесь на www.group-telegram.com/ms/cikrf.com
BY Выборы, всем ЦЫК!
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
Update March 8, 2022: EFF has clarified that Channels and Groups are not fully encrypted, end-to-end, updated our post to link to Telegram’s FAQ for Cloud and Secret chats, updated to clarify that auto-delete is available for group and channel admins, and added some additional links. In the past, it was noticed that through bulk SMSes, investors were induced to invest in or purchase the stocks of certain listed companies. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. On December 23rd, 2020, Pavel Durov posted to his channel that the company would need to start generating revenue. In early 2021, he added that any advertising on the platform would not use user data for targeting, and that it would be focused on “large one-to-many channels.” He pledged that ads would be “non-intrusive” and that most users would simply not notice any change. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback.
from ms
