Рекомендую! Марк Мефёд написал вдохновляющий обзор книг о политическом сопротивлении животных. Могут ли животные бороться за свою свободу, если у них нет таких социальных инструментов как у человека? Оказывается, что да. Осьминоги, коровы, петухи, слоны, касатки и верблюды выбирают свободу от насилия и смерти.
Рекомендую! Марк Мефёд написал вдохновляющий обзор книг о политическом сопротивлении животных. Могут ли животные бороться за свою свободу, если у них нет таких социальных инструментов как у человека? Оказывается, что да. Осьминоги, коровы, петухи, слоны, касатки и верблюды выбирают свободу от насилия и смерти.
BY Более странно, чем
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
On Feb. 27, however, he admitted from his Russian-language account that "Telegram channels are increasingly becoming a source of unverified information related to Ukrainian events." To that end, when files are actively downloading, a new icon now appears in the Search bar that users can tap to view and manage downloads, pause and resume all downloads or just individual items, and select one to increase its priority or view it in a chat. Given the pro-privacy stance of the platform, it’s taken as a given that it’ll be used for a number of reasons, not all of them good. And Telegram has been attached to a fair few scandals related to terrorism, sexual exploitation and crime. Back in 2015, Vox described Telegram as “ISIS’ app of choice,” saying that the platform’s real use is the ability to use channels to distribute material to large groups at once. Telegram has acted to remove public channels affiliated with terrorism, but Pavel Durov reiterated that he had no business snooping on private conversations. In addition, Telegram's architecture limits the ability to slow the spread of false information: the lack of a central public feed, and the fact that comments are easily disabled in channels, reduce the space for public pushback. Right now the digital security needs of Russians and Ukrainians are very different, and they lead to very different caveats about how to mitigate the risks associated with using Telegram. For Ukrainians in Ukraine, whose physical safety is at risk because they are in a war zone, digital security is probably not their highest priority. They may value access to news and communication with their loved ones over making sure that all of their communications are encrypted in such a manner that they are indecipherable to Telegram, its employees, or governments with court orders.
from ms
