🧹❄️Уборка города в усиленном режиме: снег и гололедица под контролем
В Петербурге продолжается работа по очистке улиц в связи с ухудшением погодных условий. Тротуары обработаны противогололедными материалами, а сегодня на улицы вышла метущая техника для уборки снега. В труднодоступных местах работают бригады ручной уборки, особое внимание уделяется остановкам и пешеходным зонам. 📹 Подробнее — смотрите в нашем репортаже!
Видео, фото: Виталий Арсеньев, Алексей Афанасьев, Александр Гальперин Петербургский дневник
🧹❄️Уборка города в усиленном режиме: снег и гололедица под контролем
В Петербурге продолжается работа по очистке улиц в связи с ухудшением погодных условий. Тротуары обработаны противогололедными материалами, а сегодня на улицы вышла метущая техника для уборки снега. В труднодоступных местах работают бригады ручной уборки, особое внимание уделяется остановкам и пешеходным зонам. 📹 Подробнее — смотрите в нашем репортаже!
Видео, фото: Виталий Арсеньев, Алексей Афанасьев, Александр Гальперин Петербургский дневник
You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. The next bit isn’t clear, but Durov reportedly claimed that his resignation, dated March 21st, was an April Fools’ prank. TechCrunch implies that it was a matter of principle, but it’s hard to be clear on the wheres, whos and whys. Similarly, on April 17th, the Moscow Times quoted Durov as saying that he quit the company after being pressured to reveal account details about Ukrainians protesting the then-president Viktor Yanukovych. He said that since his platform does not have the capacity to check all channels, it may restrict some in Russia and Ukraine "for the duration of the conflict," but then reversed course hours later after many users complained that Telegram was an important source of information. A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. Telegram, which does little policing of its content, has also became a hub for Russian propaganda and misinformation. Many pro-Kremlin channels have become popular, alongside accounts of journalists and other independent observers.
from ms
