Как оправдание насилия обществом влияет на пострадавших
Закрывая глаза на насилие, общество не только лишает жертв поддержки, но и повторно травмирует их через обвинения и бездействие. Оправдание насилия становится частью системы, усугубляя состояние жертв.
По мнению экспертов, перемены возможны: признание вреда, защита и справедливость способны вернуть пострадавшим чувство достоинства.
Того же мнения придерживается профессорка, исследовательница и психотерапевтка Джудит Герман, написавшая на эту тему книгу «Травма и исцеление». Подробнее об этом в сегодняшней статье⬇️
Как оправдание насилия обществом влияет на пострадавших
Закрывая глаза на насилие, общество не только лишает жертв поддержки, но и повторно травмирует их через обвинения и бездействие. Оправдание насилия становится частью системы, усугубляя состояние жертв.
По мнению экспертов, перемены возможны: признание вреда, защита и справедливость способны вернуть пострадавшим чувство достоинства.
Того же мнения придерживается профессорка, исследовательница и психотерапевтка Джудит Герман, написавшая на эту тему книгу «Травма и исцеление». Подробнее об этом в сегодняшней статье⬇️
But the Ukraine Crisis Media Center's Tsekhanovska points out that communications are often down in zones most affected by the war, making this sort of cross-referencing a luxury many cannot afford. Telegram has become more interventionist over time, and has steadily increased its efforts to shut down these accounts. But this has also meant that the company has also engaged with lawmakers more generally, although it maintains that it doesn’t do so willingly. For instance, in September 2021, Telegram reportedly blocked a chat bot in support of (Putin critic) Alexei Navalny during Russia’s most recent parliamentary elections. Pavel Durov was quoted at the time saying that the company was obliged to follow a “legitimate” law of the land. He added that as Apple and Google both follow the law, to violate it would give both platforms a reason to boot the messenger from its stores. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had carried out a similar exercise in 2017 in a matter related to circulation of messages through WhatsApp. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. In the United States, Telegram's lower public profile has helped it mostly avoid high level scrutiny from Congress, but it has not gone unnoticed.
from ms
