Я оце помітила, що багато малюночків сюда не кидала. Тому поки не можу показувати замовлення, покажу старі ￣ 3￣ Я пам'ятаю тоді у трьох моїх любімок були дн декілька днів поряд, і я тоді прям спідранила, щоб всюди встигнути. Може ще потім покидаю спідпеінти, якщо комусь цікаві ~ #art
Я оце помітила, що багато малюночків сюда не кидала. Тому поки не можу показувати замовлення, покажу старі ￣ 3￣ Я пам'ятаю тоді у трьох моїх любімок були дн декілька днів поряд, і я тоді прям спідранила, щоб всюди встигнути. Може ще потім покидаю спідпеінти, якщо комусь цікаві ~ #art
A Russian Telegram channel with over 700,000 followers is spreading disinformation about Russia's invasion of Ukraine under the guise of providing "objective information" and fact-checking fake news. Its influence extends beyond the platform, with major Russian publications, government officials, and journalists citing the page's posts. On February 27th, Durov posted that Channels were becoming a source of unverified information and that the company lacks the ability to check on their veracity. He urged users to be mistrustful of the things shared on Channels, and initially threatened to block the feature in the countries involved for the length of the war, saying that he didn’t want Telegram to be used to aggravate conflict or incite ethnic hatred. He did, however, walk back this plan when it became clear that they had also become a vital communications tool for Ukrainian officials and citizens to help coordinate their resistance and evacuations. Since its launch in 2013, Telegram has grown from a simple messaging app to a broadcast network. Its user base isn’t as vast as WhatsApp’s, and its broadcast platform is a fraction the size of Twitter, but it’s nonetheless showing its use. While Telegram has been embroiled in controversy for much of its life, it has become a vital source of communication during the invasion of Ukraine. But, if all of this is new to you, let us explain, dear friends, what on Earth a Telegram is meant to be, and why you should, or should not, need to care. DFR Lab sent the image through Microsoft Azure's Face Verification program and found that it was "highly unlikely" that the person in the second photo was the same as the first woman. The fact-checker Logically AI also found the claim to be false. The woman, Olena Kurilo, was also captured in a video after the airstrike and shown to have the injuries. "Like the bombing of the maternity ward in Mariupol," he said, "Even before it hits the news, you see the videos on the Telegram channels."
from ms
