The Carter regime gave arms and ammunition to the Suharto regime during its invasion of East Timor, resulting in the deaths of 185,000.
Carter supported Mobutu in Zaire, the Mujahideen in Afghanistan, described himself as a personal friend of the Shah of Iran, funded the military junta in El Salvador, and general Chun Doo-hwan's regime in occupied Korea.
He may have done some good things. But also like every president, he's made himself a criminal. If Nuremberg precedent were applied to the US, every president past and present would be put on trial for crimes against humanity.
The Carter regime gave arms and ammunition to the Suharto regime during its invasion of East Timor, resulting in the deaths of 185,000.
Carter supported Mobutu in Zaire, the Mujahideen in Afghanistan, described himself as a personal friend of the Shah of Iran, funded the military junta in El Salvador, and general Chun Doo-hwan's regime in occupied Korea.
He may have done some good things. But also like every president, he's made himself a criminal. If Nuremberg precedent were applied to the US, every president past and present would be put on trial for crimes against humanity.
BY Grouchy Socialists
Warning: Undefined variable $i in /var/www/group-telegram/post.php on line 260
In a message on his Telegram channel recently recounting the episode, Durov wrote: "I lost my company and my home, but would do it again – without hesitation." "We as Ukrainians believe that the truth is on our side, whether it's truth that you're proclaiming about the war and everything else, why would you want to hide it?," he said. This provided opportunity to their linked entities to offload their shares at higher prices and make significant profits at the cost of unsuspecting retail investors. Asked about its stance on disinformation, Telegram spokesperson Remi Vaughn told AFP: "As noted by our CEO, the sheer volume of information being shared on channels makes it extremely difficult to verify, so it's important that users double-check what they read." If you initiate a Secret Chat, however, then these communications are end-to-end encrypted and are tied to the device you are using. That means it’s less convenient to access them across multiple platforms, but you are at far less risk of snooping. Back in the day, Secret Chats received some praise from the EFF, but the fact that its standard system isn’t as secure earned it some criticism. If you’re looking for something that is considered more reliable by privacy advocates, then Signal is the EFF’s preferred platform, although that too is not without some caveats.
from ms
