Эксклюзив Прорыв штурмовой группы в н.п. Снагость, Курская обл.
09.09.2024г в 10:30 колонна из 3 танков и 6 БМД 51 ПДП 106 ПДД выдвинулась с н.п. Корнево в сторону н.п. Снагость, прорываясь через блокпосты ВСУ. В н.п. Снагость колонна разделилась на 3 группы, занимая пути отступления ВСУ в круговую оборону, держали трое суток до подхода основных подразделений ВС РФ🇷🇺
Эксклюзив Прорыв штурмовой группы в н.п. Снагость, Курская обл.
09.09.2024г в 10:30 колонна из 3 танков и 6 БМД 51 ПДП 106 ПДД выдвинулась с н.п. Корнево в сторону н.п. Снагость, прорываясь через блокпосты ВСУ. В н.п. Снагость колонна разделилась на 3 группы, занимая пути отступления ВСУ в круговую оборону, держали трое суток до подхода основных подразделений ВС РФ🇷🇺
Official government accounts have also spread fake fact checks. An official Twitter account for the Russia diplomatic mission in Geneva shared a fake debunking video claiming without evidence that "Western and Ukrainian media are creating thousands of fake news on Russia every day." The video, which has amassed almost 30,000 views, offered a "how-to" spot misinformation. You may recall that, back when Facebook started changing WhatsApp’s terms of service, a number of news outlets reported on, and even recommended, switching to Telegram. Pavel Durov even said that users should delete WhatsApp “unless you are cool with all of your photos and messages becoming public one day.” But Telegram can’t be described as a more-secure version of WhatsApp. The company maintains that it cannot act against individual or group chats, which are “private amongst their participants,” but it will respond to requests in relation to sticker sets, channels and bots which are publicly available. During the invasion of Ukraine, Pavel Durov has wrestled with this issue a lot more prominently than he has before. Channels like Donbass Insider and Bellum Acta, as reported by Foreign Policy, started pumping out pro-Russian propaganda as the invasion began. So much so that the Ukrainian National Security and Defense Council issued a statement labeling which accounts are Russian-backed. Ukrainian officials, in potential violation of the Geneva Convention, have shared imagery of dead and captured Russian soldiers on the platform. Telegram has gained a reputation as the “secure” communications app in the post-Soviet states, but whenever you make choices about your digital security, it’s important to start by asking yourself, “What exactly am I securing? And who am I securing it from?” These questions should inform your decisions about whether you are using the right tool or platform for your digital security needs. Telegram is certainly not the most secure messaging app on the market right now. Its security model requires users to place a great deal of trust in Telegram’s ability to protect user data. For some users, this may be good enough for now. For others, it may be wiser to move to a different platform for certain kinds of high-risk communications. Channels are not fully encrypted, end-to-end. All communications on a Telegram channel can be seen by anyone on the channel and are also visible to Telegram. Telegram may be asked by a government to hand over the communications from a channel. Telegram has a history of standing up to Russian government requests for data, but how comfortable you are relying on that history to predict future behavior is up to you. Because Telegram has this data, it may also be stolen by hackers or leaked by an internal employee.
from ms
