Конспирологи, ещё не спите? Тут Ротшильды The Economist выпустил очередную обложку-ребус с прогнозами на 2024 год. Мы её тщательно изучили, нашли несколько своих трактовок и сделали новые восхитительные карточки.
Плюсом — добавили все трактовки, которые появились за день: как от СМИ, так и от блогеров-публицистов. Так что смотрите, изучайте и пишите в комменты, чего сами увидели.
Конспирологи, ещё не спите? Тут Ротшильды The Economist выпустил очередную обложку-ребус с прогнозами на 2024 год. Мы её тщательно изучили, нашли несколько своих трактовок и сделали новые восхитительные карточки.
Плюсом — добавили все трактовки, которые появились за день: как от СМИ, так и от блогеров-публицистов. Так что смотрите, изучайте и пишите в комменты, чего сами увидели.
At its heart, Telegram is little more than a messaging app like WhatsApp or Signal. But it also offers open channels that enable a single user, or a group of users, to communicate with large numbers in a method similar to a Twitter account. This has proven to be both a blessing and a curse for Telegram and its users, since these channels can be used for both good and ill. Right now, as Wired reports, the app is a key way for Ukrainians to receive updates from the government during the invasion. Groups are also not fully encrypted, end-to-end. This includes private groups. Private groups cannot be seen by other Telegram users, but Telegram itself can see the groups and all of the communications that you have in them. All of the same risks and warnings about channels can be applied to groups. "The argument from Telegram is, 'You should trust us because we tell you that we're trustworthy,'" Maréchal said. "It's really in the eye of the beholder whether that's something you want to buy into." This ability to mix the public and the private, as well as the ability to use bots to engage with users has proved to be problematic. In early 2021, a database selling phone numbers pulled from Facebook was selling numbers for $20 per lookup. Similarly, security researchers found a network of deepfake bots on the platform that were generating images of people submitted by users to create non-consensual imagery, some of which involved children. Multiple pro-Kremlin media figures circulated the post's false claims, including prominent Russian journalist Vladimir Soloviev and the state-controlled Russian outlet RT, according to the DFR Lab's report.
from ms